Ils ont osé.!

., réduire Charlie Chaplin à l'exil.
Après "le Dictateur"  'The Great Dictator'?  "Lumières sur la Ville" 'City Lights' ? ou bien "les Temps modernes" 'Modern Times' ? ou bien à cause de toute sa carrière - because of his whole career ?

Mais sans doute ce brave Charlie ne demandait-il pas mieux que se retrouver, dans ses vieux jours, au pied des Alpes suisses.

Je me demande si, en ce moment chez notre Oncle Sam, d'autres encore ne songent pas à suivre son exemple..?

Et tout cela dans quel but, pour financer quoi encore, dis-nous donc Oncle Sam.?!
http://histoireetsociete.wordpress.com/2014/08/10/une-guerre-contre-la-russie-mais-aussi-contre-leurope/

Message sur le Mur de Facebook - Post on Facebook Wall  by Michel Paul Vanrolleghem.

The initial message sounded like this:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-01/top-financial-experts-say-world-war-3-coming-%E2%80%A6-unless-we-stop-it

The first comment registered was:

the Iraq war wasn't only about oil. the reasons for that war were based on some advanced studies in gaming theory, which Bush learned at Harvard. the basis of the theory is a simpler than that, the science is about decisions making based on multiple positive outcomes, and one possible bad outcome. the US strategic plan had no possibility that we would lose the war in Iraq, the only question then was how many positive outcomes could we achieve.

wmds were only one possible outcome. breaking the oil contracts Iraq had with France and Russia another. hegemony and containment of Iran, another. (with US troops in Afghanistan Iran was surrounded on two sides) providing a huge fiscal boost to a faltering economy was another (check the chart of the DOW in 2003). providing a democratic government in the ME, another. getting Bush reelected, (and keeping the new grassroots republican movement and majority in all three branches of government. the democrat party was headed for extinction in 2003). that the war ends up costing between 2 and 6 T is a lingering problem, that same money applied to energy subsidies for americans would have achieved more for the economy.

Iraq dovetailed with the new Nato policy, which we see continues in Ukraine, the colonization of EE for modern industrial expansion and the benefit of EU/FED central banker complex. This little war in Ukraine is a long simmering extension of Cheneys missiles aimed at Moscow in all the former soviet satellites states. Iraq was a cover, since another reason was to prevent Iraq missiles from reaching Europe. The US through Cheney has put missiles in place which can take out C&C in Moscow in around two minutes. the war in Iraq helped us do this.

Now a war with Moscow is even more onerous (for them really) and less likely to stay limited. But a little of the old cold war pressure, and in the next iteration Russia will fall apart completely (the hope is). To me the key to all this is Iran. The US has been quietly ignoring Iran, but whenever the magician draws your attention the left hand you better watch what the right hand is doing, and waiting in the wings is the number one Iran hater, HC. even if she doesnt run, she can influence policy.

These guys can move the shells pretty quickly, remember Syria we were going to war with them about a month ago. not a word now, the MSM is expert at directing attention where and when the USG deems it. And the catalyst for that is Gaza, since the sense of fair play extends beyond just American values, if the onesided war between Israel and Palestine goes on much longer somebody will start supplying Gaza with some real firepower, or Hamas in Beirut will join the mix. and that will put Iran back in the crosshairs.

The US/EU has achieved most of its objectives in Ukraine. that problem will go offline pretty soon.

China is being dealt out of the game, that leaves Iran, one more Arab spring movement, (although they are Persian) and Pakistan is a lingering issue..,

by: the grateful unemployed